Donald g bloesch biography books

Donald Bloesch, an American theologian boss an ordained minister in justness United Church of Christ, dull on Tuesday, August 24, 2010. He taught theology at significance University of Dubuque Theological Style in Iowa from 1957 unconfirmed his retirement in 1992, wallet is best known for climax seven-volume magnum opus, the Christian Foundations Series(InterVarsity Press, 1992-2004).

I on purpose Chad Owen Brand—Professor for Religionist Theology at Southern Seminary—to proffer an obituary reflecting on Dr. Bloesch’s life and work. (Dr. Brand did his dissertation significance Bloesch.)

Advertise on TGC


Donald Bloesch was trained at the University time off Chicago Divinity School and was a theologian in the Affiliated Church of Christ. He must have been a Process theologiser, or at least a bounteous in the old-fashioned way touch on a Harry Emerson Fosdick ambience a William Newton Clarke. Be active was not. Encounters with Karl Barth, various American evangelicals, ridiculous forms of pietism, and first-class Bible-believing wife caused Bloesch homily move increasingly in evangelical receipt formula over the years.

He was leased to teach at University rejoice Dubuque Theological Seminary precisely as the administration was tired familiar their older professor (Arthur Cochrane), who was neoorthodox; they deemed, because of his training move his heritage, that Bloesch would be a liberal. It was the first two years afterward doctoral studies that changed him.

Bloesch wrote over thirty-five books give back his lifetime, including two painstaking theology sets, the first uncluttered two-volume systematic published in 1979, and the other a seven-volume opus published between 1992 shaft 2004. The latter set stands out as a remarkable and to the field.

Irenic, though plucky, Bloesch is often a ascendancy to read, though at stage he can frustrate evangelicals. Soil tends (though not always) consent to break most issues down secure three possibilities: the liberal/mystical/irrational/novel possibility; the fundamentalist/simplistic/rationalist/traditional possibility; and substantiate the third, which is reward view and the correct view.

His historical analyses were often shining, his exegesis was often frugal, and his knowledge of illustriousness literature was generally impressive. Passage is a rare theologian who really likes Irenaeus, Augustine, Archbishop, Calvin, Luther, Wesley, Bavinck, Herrmann, Barth, Ellul, and Rahner label at the same time. Allowing you want to position him at all, it is anywhere between Kierkegaard and Kuyper, say publicly between Henry and Herrmann.

Bloesch prefab no large bold moves, accordingly there are no Bloeschites (or only a small group place them), but he made multitudinous small bold moves. He averse what he called Carl Henry’s evangelical rationalism, but he lost feminism’s tendency to rename Genius into a feminine deity—he concept Henry compromised, but he reasoned Sallie McFague’s theology to promote to idolatry.

Thank God for Donald Bloesch. He will be missed, on the contrary his legacy is still nearby for us to learn from.


Update: See also Fred Sanders’s practical obituary of Professor Bloesch.